Mentoring Cross-Functional Partners: A Case Study
As a former educator, I enjoy helping those I work with gain clarity and insight. I work from where you are, not from what I know. Whether mentoring junior researchers or training cross-functional partners on democratized research practices, I aim to deliver knowledge that will keep you growing as a practitioner of your craft.
Coaching Sessions: Case Study of 3 Questions for PMs Working with UXRs
TL;DR
100% Product Manager’s participation in monthly de-risk coaching sessions.
Role
Cross-Functional Team Lead
Duration
Monthly over 1.5 years
Methods
Subject-Matter-Expert Interviews, Surveys, Design Review, Human-Centred Design, Feedback Review
Tools
Airtable, Slack, Figma, Confluence, Google Docs, Polly.ai, Google Meet
Reach
14 Product Managers (3 Director; 4 Senior PM; 6 PM; 1 Associate PM)
Situation: The Problem
I hold monthly coaching sessions with Product Managers (PMs) at Wattpad to ensure Research and Product share the same drivers and blockers. In a previous session, I toured the PMs through Experience Research offerings - methods and tools - so the PMs better understood when, why, and how we use each. For this particular session, I surveyed the PMs to discover their needs, and then modelled future sessions.
Task: What Answers Do We Need?
For this session, I wanted to know three things (and suggested they select all that apply, visible by the percentages):
- What’s working for you with your UXR partnerships?
Getting insights I need (78%)
I’m able to make more informed product decisions (78%)
I understand our users better (56%)
UXR is essential for identifying potential future product opportunities (56%)
Time to insights has improved (33%)
- What could be improved in your partnerships with UXR (qualitative, open-ended question = text results below)?
Working more closely with data scientists
Limitations to research discovery
Knowing what questions to ask
Product use cases
Product discovery, improvements, and problem identification
- What would I, as a PM, like to know more about (select all that apply, visible by the percentages)?
Appraising risk (78%)
User workflows (56%)
Research limitations (44%)
Insights interpretation (44%)
Asking research discovery questions (33%)
Developed Slide Deck to show results.
Action: How I Solved The Problem
Prioritizing the results above, I designed and offered the following resources to not only improve the PMs and our product offerings, but also to bolster cross-functionality.
-
Weekly User Chat Guide & Resources (Voice of the Customer program, discussed here in my portfolio)
-
Video tour (using Loom) of how to access and use our Insights Repository Airtable.
-
UXR Office Hours - biweekly sessions to hone PMs democratized research craft.
-
Developed a Research Risk Matrix tool to illustrate low-and-high lift research (not incl. in above screengrab, but here).
Result: Metrics Unlocked
The survey results aided in strengthening the Research team’s cross-functional relationship with our PM partners, because we could tailor how we work with them for each product vertical.
After this single session:
- PMs 50% more confident in drafting questions to ask Analytics or to develop user survey questions.
With coaching support overall:
- Shipped more, sooner.
With better awareness of what features or iterations require rigorous testing vs. minimum viable research to bypass additional inquiry, with the Research Risk Matrix.
- Tighter and better aligned research & product roadmaps.
Decreased timeframes for desk, competitor, and market research.
Next Time: Scaling Considerations
Concision over verbosity. In the past year I’ve edited my communication processes, aiming for easier explanations in as few words as possible. I know this will increase participation and usability of my stakeholder surveys, research decks, and presentations.